Neha (Banka) Kanoria vs Unknown on 11 August, 2021

Introduction: The case of Neha (Banka) Kanoria involves a revisional application, C.R.R. No.2829 of 2018, concerning the quantum of maintenance/accommodation allowances granted by the learned Sessions Court. The petitioner, Neha (Banka) Kanoria, seeks redressal regarding the excess amount paid by her husband/petitioner, Yashodhan Kanoria, as per the order passed by the learned revisional court.

Background: Neha (Banka) Kanoria filed a revisional application challenging the order passed by the learned revisional court, which upheld the order regarding maintenance/accommodation allowances issued in August 2017. The dispute primarily revolves around the quantum of maintenance received by Neha (Banka) Kanoria from her husband, Yashodhan Kanoria, as part of her salary from the university.

Key Arguments: The petitioner’s counsel expresses dissatisfaction with the excess amount paid by Yashodhan Kanoria, citing the order passed by the learned Sessions Court. Conversely, the counsel for the opposite party no.2 in CRR 2527 of 2018 supports the reasoning of the learned revisional court. Arguments are centered on clarifying the quantum of excess amount paid by Yashodhan Kanoria and its justification based on the court’s order.

Court’s Observations: The court notes the discrepancy regarding the quantum of excess amount paid by Yashodhan Kanoria to Neha (Banka) Kanoria. Given the complexities of the dispute and the need for clarity on the excess amount issue, the court directs both parties’ counsels to seek necessary instructions and reconvene before the court.

Court’s Decision: The matter is scheduled to reappear on 12.08.2021 under the heading “To Be Mentioned.” The court directs the counsels for both parties to gather relevant instructions regarding the excess amount issue and present them before the court on the specified date.

Conclusion: The judgment demonstrates the court’s commitment to addressing disputes promptly and ensuring clarity on contentious issues, such as the quantum of maintenance payments. By directing the counsels to obtain necessary instructions and reconvene, the court seeks to facilitate a thorough examination of the excess amount issue, ensuring fair and equitable resolution. The case underscores the importance of judicial oversight in matrimonial disputes and the court’s role in adjudicating complex financial matters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *