Deepu Ramachandran Nair @ Deepu.R vs Nil on 11 January, 2021


The case of Deepu Ramachandran Nair @ Deepu.R vs Nil, heard in the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, involves an appeal against the decision of the Family Court in Thiruvananthapuram regarding a petition for mutual divorce between Deepu Ramachandran Nair and Archana Ruby Venkumar.


The petitioners, Deepu Ramachandran Nair and Archana Ruby Venkumar, after more than a year of living separately since May 23, 2019, filed a joint petition for divorce on September 7, 2020. They subsequently applied to waive the statutory six-month waiting period required under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, citing Deepu’s imminent relocation to Mexico as a pressing reason.

Key Arguments:

The petitioners’ counsel argued that since a year had elapsed since the couple’s separation, and given the urgency due to Deepu’s relocation plans, the Family Court should waive the six-month period. The aim was to expedite the legal dissolution of their marriage, allowing them to move forward with their respective lives without legal entanglements.

Court’s Observations:

The High Court, presided over by Justices A. Muhamed Mustaque and C.S. Dias, evaluated the request against the provisions of Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, which mandates a six-month waiting period. The court noted the petitioners’ unique circumstances but emphasized the necessity of adhering to statutory requirements unless exceptional circumstances warranted a deviation.

Court’s Decision:

The High Court upheld the Family Court’s decision to deny the waiver of the six-month waiting period. However, it recognized the logistical challenges posed by Deepu’s overseas employment and suggested that the petitioners request the Family Court to facilitate their participation in the proceedings via electronic means. The court dismissed the original petition but allowed the petitioners the liberty to approach the Family Court for procedural accommodations.


This case underscores the judiciary’s balancing act between adhering to legislative mandates and acknowledging the practical difficulties faced by individuals in legal proceedings. The High Court’s decision to dismiss the petition for a waiver of the waiting period highlights the importance of statutory periods in ensuring thoughtful deliberation in marital dissolution. Nonetheless, the court’s openness to electronic participation reflects an adaptation to contemporary challenges, facilitating legal processes in a globalized context.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *