Vandhana M vs Karthik Thirumal Girija on 19 October, 2022


In the Supreme Court of India, the case of Vandhana M vs Karthik Thirumal Girija, presided over by Justices Surya Kant and J.B. Pardiwala, involved a petition for the transfer of a civil matter related to matrimonial disputes. The proceedings, marked by a discussion on the potential for mediation, took place on October 19, 2022.


Vandhana M, the petitioner, filed a Transfer Petition (Civil) against Karthik Thirumal Girija, seeking certain reliefs including the transfer of their matrimonial dispute case. Accompanied by stay applications and other procedural requests, the petition highlighted the ongoing legal complexities faced by the couple.

Key Arguments:

The key arguments revolved around the petitioner’s request for legal adjustments and considerations, such as exemption from filing certain documents and a stay on proceedings, alongside the main transfer petition. Both parties, represented by their respective counsels, discussed these matters before the bench.

Court’s Observations:

The court observed the parties’ openness to exploring an amicable settlement through mediation rather than prolonging the litigation process. Recognizing the potential benefits of resolving disputes outside the courtroom, the justices encouraged the parties to engage in mediation.

Court’s Decision:

Justice Surya Kant, along with Justice J.B. Pardiwala, ordered the parties to attend a mediation session at the Supreme Court Mediation Centre scheduled for November 18, 2022. The respondent was directed to provide financial support for the petitioner’s travel and lodging expenses related to the mediation. The matter was set to be revisited on January 23, 2023, pending the outcome of the mediation efforts.


The decision to direct the disputing parties toward mediation reflects the judiciary’s increasing inclination to support alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, particularly in personal and sensitive cases like matrimonial disputes. This approach not only aims to de-escalate conflict but also provides a more personable and potentially harmonious resolution to deeply personal issues, highlighting the court’s role in fostering reconciliation and understanding between parties.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *